rolex sub no date uhrforum | rolex sub no date 14060 rolex sub no date uhrforum My first Rolex was a DD, followed by a YM and a GMT. The Submariner date was my 4th choice. Sure I like my 116619LB but it does not give me the same wow feeling as i.e. my latest GMT CHNR. $6,500.00
0 · rolex submariner no date 2020
1 · rolex submariner 41mm no date
2 · rolex submariner 114060 no date
3 · rolex sub no date price
4 · rolex sub no date 14060
5 · rolex no date submariner 2021
6 · 2023 submariner no date 124060
7 · 2023 submariner 41mm no date
$1,845.00
My first Rolex was a DD, followed by a YM and a GMT. The Submariner date was my 4th choice. Sure I like my 116619LB but it does not give me the same wow feeling as i.e. . Hi guys. Looking for some help. I have no need for a date on my watch so just asking purely on esthetics and resale is not important. Which do you prefer, Sub date or no .
My first Rolex was a DD, followed by a YM and a GMT. The Submariner date was my 4th choice. Sure I like my 116619LB but it does not give me the same wow feeling as i.e. my latest GMT CHNR. Hi guys. Looking for some help. I have no need for a date on my watch so just asking purely on esthetics and resale is not important. Which do you prefer, Sub date or no-date? I’m having a hard time decided and curious to hear some different lines of reasoning. Thanks! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I prefer no date, but really, this is just personal preference (I pretty much always know what day (and date) it is, as my job and basic life routine depends on that), while I can easily see why others would prefer the date--really just depends on the individual--both are great. A no-date Sub is at this point an acquired purist's taste and if your just wanting a watch, date all the way. Date is much harder to get than the no date which were always unsold in dealers cases until the shortage kicked in, if that tells you anything. Has anyone purchased a sub no date and wish they would have bought one with a date function or vis-versa? What are your thoughts?! I am really torn on this decision. No date all the way. It drove me nuts looking at the sub date and watching the minute and seconds hands dip under the cyclops. The no date is so symmetrical and clean, I love it. Rolex does a great job of creating clean, simple dials like this. The Milgauss is .
Only 1 out of every 5 steel Submariner's that Rolex produces are the No Date variety, making it more rare, unique, and therefore of greater interest to Rolex enthusiasts. E. Heritage. The original Submariner from 1954 to 1970 was only available without the Date feature.
I absolutely LOVE the 124060 no date. I think the simplicity and symmetry of the dial really makes it for me. I inquired about the sub no date towards the end of April and had the option of a date v no date by the 5th or May. Snagged no date and don’t for a second regret it
Only 1 out of every 5 steel Submariner's that Rolex produces are the No Date variety, making it more rare, unique, and therefore of greater interest to Rolex enthusiasts. E. Heritage. The original Submariner from 1954 to 1970 was only available without the Date feature. But the truth is, I absolutely love the Explorer range (1 and II) as well as the Sub (especially the no date). And I feel it would be great to have at least one Rolex in my collection (even if I never buy a second Rolex in my lifetime). My first Rolex was a DD, followed by a YM and a GMT. The Submariner date was my 4th choice. Sure I like my 116619LB but it does not give me the same wow feeling as i.e. my latest GMT CHNR. Hi guys. Looking for some help. I have no need for a date on my watch so just asking purely on esthetics and resale is not important. Which do you prefer, Sub date or no-date? I’m having a hard time decided and curious to hear some different lines of reasoning. Thanks! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I prefer no date, but really, this is just personal preference (I pretty much always know what day (and date) it is, as my job and basic life routine depends on that), while I can easily see why others would prefer the date--really just depends on the individual--both are great. A no-date Sub is at this point an acquired purist's taste and if your just wanting a watch, date all the way. Date is much harder to get than the no date which were always unsold in dealers cases until the shortage kicked in, if that tells you anything. Has anyone purchased a sub no date and wish they would have bought one with a date function or vis-versa? What are your thoughts?! I am really torn on this decision. No date all the way. It drove me nuts looking at the sub date and watching the minute and seconds hands dip under the cyclops. The no date is so symmetrical and clean, I love it. Rolex does a great job of creating clean, simple dials like this. The Milgauss is .
Only 1 out of every 5 steel Submariner's that Rolex produces are the No Date variety, making it more rare, unique, and therefore of greater interest to Rolex enthusiasts. E. Heritage. The original Submariner from 1954 to 1970 was only available without the Date feature.I absolutely LOVE the 124060 no date. I think the simplicity and symmetry of the dial really makes it for me. I inquired about the sub no date towards the end of April and had the option of a date v no date by the 5th or May. Snagged no date and don’t for a second regret it Only 1 out of every 5 steel Submariner's that Rolex produces are the No Date variety, making it more rare, unique, and therefore of greater interest to Rolex enthusiasts. E. Heritage. The original Submariner from 1954 to 1970 was only available without the Date feature.
rolex submariner no date 2020
rolex submariner 41mm no date
rolex submariner 114060 no date
rolex sub no date price
rolex sub no date 14060
$6,200.00
rolex sub no date uhrforum|rolex sub no date 14060
