rolex submariner 14060 vs 16610 | Rolex 16610t stainless submariner

2024-11-23T10:42:10 | By coaching vocacional , DOD blog

rolex submariner 14060 vs 16610 | Rolex 16610t stainless submariner rolex submariner 14060 vs 16610 I finally have both Rolex Submariner pre ceramic models and will begin the comparison journey with them. NEW Rolex Submariner No Date 124060 41mm $ 12,877 + $100 for shipping. US. .

0 · Rolex Submariner 16610 year
1 · Rolex Submariner 16610 value
2 · Rolex Submariner 16610 swiss only
3 · Rolex Submariner 16610 stainless steel
4 · Rolex Submariner 16610 new
5 · Rolex Submariner 16610 best years
6 · Rolex 16610t stainless submariner
7 · Rolex 16610 submariner chisholm hunter

Rolex Submariner (No Date) Ceramic 41mm Black Dial 124060 Box & Papers 2022. C$ 16,423. + C$559 for shipping. US. Rolex Submariner (No Date) 1995 Submariner .

buy online michael kors bags

Rolex Submariner 16610 year

Rolex Submariner 16610 value

The most striking difference is the 16610 offers the date feature (with cyclops); 14060 does not. To accomodate the date, the 16610 has a slightly larger and neglibibly thicker .

,493.48,909.42

So I am going round in circles on which pre-ceramic submariner to buy and finally decided to get either the 14060m or 16610. I will get one of the later models of either possible and hopefully a full set in good condition - so this will either: 16610 (2007/2008/2009); or. 14060m (2010/2011/2012). I am weighing the pros and cons of 14060M and 16610. From my subjective perspective: 14060M: Pros - no date, cleaner dial design, not as common. Cons - hollow end link, my brother-in-law has one already. 16610: Pros - COSC .I finally have both Rolex Submariner pre ceramic models and will begin the comparison journey with them. The most striking difference is the 16610 offers the date feature (with cyclops); 14060 does not. To accomodate the date, the 16610 has a slightly larger and neglibibly thicker case. Also, 14060 has lug holes, whereas after a certain MY (which I do not recall) the 16610 no longer offered them.

16610 (date version) preferably 2002 k-serial. This model benefits from solid end links and has the full submariner look with the cyclops date window. 14060M (no date version) preferably the latest model before the new ceramic was brought in - so around 2011/2012.A 2 day short update on the Rolex Submariner Comparison, 14060 vs 16610So far the 14060 leads, but this may change 🫡. Rolex Submariner 16610 VS 14060M Which one is better? Review and comparison of two classics in the making. Must haves in any Rolex collection. 16610 - 1999 A-serial, Swiss only dial, I have the original boxes but no papers. Runs well but no service history. 14060M - 2000/2001 K-serial. Swiss Made dial. No boxes but comes with a Bob’s Watches card with warranty thru mid June of this year. Runs well but no service history either.

Rolex Submariner ref. 14060 For the first time since a date display was added to the dial in the 1960s, a brand-new date-free edition was released to market in the form of the ref. 14060. Compared to its counterpart with a date (ref. 16610), the ref. 14060 includes similar white gold-trimmed hour markers, a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal . Introduced in 2010, the 116610 replaced the ref. 16610 as the date-equipped Sub in Rolex’s lineup, featuring a “Super” case and all the modern fixings, such as the updated Cal. 3135 movement with Parachrom hairspring. So I am going round in circles on which pre-ceramic submariner to buy and finally decided to get either the 14060m or 16610. I will get one of the later models of either possible and hopefully a full set in good condition - so this will either: 16610 (2007/2008/2009); or. 14060m (2010/2011/2012). I am weighing the pros and cons of 14060M and 16610. From my subjective perspective: 14060M: Pros - no date, cleaner dial design, not as common. Cons - hollow end link, my brother-in-law has one already. 16610: Pros - COSC .

I finally have both Rolex Submariner pre ceramic models and will begin the comparison journey with them.

The most striking difference is the 16610 offers the date feature (with cyclops); 14060 does not. To accomodate the date, the 16610 has a slightly larger and neglibibly thicker case. Also, 14060 has lug holes, whereas after a certain MY (which I do not recall) the 16610 no longer offered them. 16610 (date version) preferably 2002 k-serial. This model benefits from solid end links and has the full submariner look with the cyclops date window. 14060M (no date version) preferably the latest model before the new ceramic was brought in - so around 2011/2012.

A 2 day short update on the Rolex Submariner Comparison, 14060 vs 16610So far the 14060 leads, but this may change 🫡. Rolex Submariner 16610 VS 14060M Which one is better? Review and comparison of two classics in the making. Must haves in any Rolex collection. 16610 - 1999 A-serial, Swiss only dial, I have the original boxes but no papers. Runs well but no service history. 14060M - 2000/2001 K-serial. Swiss Made dial. No boxes but comes with a Bob’s Watches card with warranty thru mid June of this year. Runs well but no service history either.Rolex Submariner ref. 14060 For the first time since a date display was added to the dial in the 1960s, a brand-new date-free edition was released to market in the form of the ref. 14060. Compared to its counterpart with a date (ref. 16610), the ref. 14060 includes similar white gold-trimmed hour markers, a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal .